<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scanning Jewelry that Isn&#8217;t Flat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/scanning-jewelry-that-isnt-flat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/scanning-jewelry-that-isnt-flat/</link>
	<description>Jewelry Business Strategies by Jewelry Business Expert Rena Klingenberg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:44:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Greene</title>
		<link>http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/scanning-jewelry-that-isnt-flat/comment-page-1/#comment-1352</link>
		<dc:creator>James Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 03:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jewelry-business-blog.com/?p=201#comment-1352</guid>
		<description>Hello,

I do jewelry appraisals and use a digital camera. I used to take pearls to a local camera store that had a very sophisticated scanner that did a great job on pearls. I find that my new Kodak scanner does a reasonable job on pearls. However, with the current digital cameras I find that they are more than adequate for photographing most jewelry.

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I do jewelry appraisals and use a digital camera. I used to take pearls to a local camera store that had a very sophisticated scanner that did a great job on pearls. I find that my new Kodak scanner does a reasonable job on pearls. However, with the current digital cameras I find that they are more than adequate for photographing most jewelry.</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TahitianPearlJewels</title>
		<link>http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/scanning-jewelry-that-isnt-flat/comment-page-1/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>TahitianPearlJewels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jewelry-business-blog.com/?p=201#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been trying to get a perfect white background on some of the pieces that I&#039;m selling online via camera. While I&#039;ve had some success here and there, I&#039;ve always had a bit of a problem in perfecting my set-up (lightbox, camera settings, lights, etc). 

In the interest of expediency, I&#039;ve resorted to having some exotic-looking backgrounds instead. The results have been great, and feedback has been good.

However, I&#039;m a bit curious with your scanning technique. You mention that this might not be a good idea with pieces that have more depth, but have you tried scanning pearls, specifically black pearls? I would think that the scanner light might wash away the nacre depth of the scanned piece -- something that makes this a moot exercise, but I would be interested in the result nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to get a perfect white background on some of the pieces that I&#8217;m selling online via camera. While I&#8217;ve had some success here and there, I&#8217;ve always had a bit of a problem in perfecting my set-up (lightbox, camera settings, lights, etc). </p>
<p>In the interest of expediency, I&#8217;ve resorted to having some exotic-looking backgrounds instead. The results have been great, and feedback has been good.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m a bit curious with your scanning technique. You mention that this might not be a good idea with pieces that have more depth, but have you tried scanning pearls, specifically black pearls? I would think that the scanner light might wash away the nacre depth of the scanned piece &#8212; something that makes this a moot exercise, but I would be interested in the result nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

