<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lead-Containing Jewelry Law &#8211; Important</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/</link>
	<description>Jewelry Business Strategies by Jewelry Business Expert Rena Klingenberg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:33:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne</title>
		<link>http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/comment-page-1/#comment-22141</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/#comment-22141</guid>
		<description>I own a children and baby bracelet company. I individually test all of my beads that I use. It is intense that way, but you can&#039;t really know about a bead until you test it individually. You may have 2 different shapes of beads with the same color profile that test totally different. And yes, cats-eye beads will never pass, so they should not be used legally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own a children and baby bracelet company. I individually test all of my beads that I use. It is intense that way, but you can&#8217;t really know about a bead until you test it individually. You may have 2 different shapes of beads with the same color profile that test totally different. And yes, cats-eye beads will never pass, so they should not be used legally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanie</title>
		<link>http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/comment-page-1/#comment-21940</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/#comment-21940</guid>
		<description>Joan-

Again, not all of the Czech fire-polished beads I had tested failed.  Some of them do pass the lead and cadmium testing.  I only thought I would have issues with the red shades and purples.  I was shocked to see the clear ones failed.  Most jade and cubic zirconia beads are safe from both lead and cadmium, but are hard to source in a variety of colors (from my research).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joan-</p>
<p>Again, not all of the Czech fire-polished beads I had tested failed.  Some of them do pass the lead and cadmium testing.  I only thought I would have issues with the red shades and purples.  I was shocked to see the clear ones failed.  Most jade and cubic zirconia beads are safe from both lead and cadmium, but are hard to source in a variety of colors (from my research).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan Fukushige</title>
		<link>http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/comment-page-1/#comment-21927</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan Fukushige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 03:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/#comment-21927</guid>
		<description>Joanie,

Thank you for the information.  I suppose the search for reliable sources of lead-free glass beads continues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joanie,</p>
<p>Thank you for the information.  I suppose the search for reliable sources of lead-free glass beads continues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanie</title>
		<link>http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/comment-page-1/#comment-21884</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/#comment-21884</guid>
		<description>@Joan-

Yes, I believe they are Jablonex (manufactured by Preciosa).
They all have trace amounts of lead, and many of them have cadmium levels that exceed the legal amounts.
Another type of bead that is widely presumed to be acceptable are cat&#039;s eye beads.
Cat&#039;s eye beads also have lead levels over 500 ppms and failed testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joan-</p>
<p>Yes, I believe they are Jablonex (manufactured by Preciosa).<br />
They all have trace amounts of lead, and many of them have cadmium levels that exceed the legal amounts.<br />
Another type of bead that is widely presumed to be acceptable are cat&#8217;s eye beads.<br />
Cat&#8217;s eye beads also have lead levels over 500 ppms and failed testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan Fukushige</title>
		<link>http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/comment-page-1/#comment-21870</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan Fukushige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 04:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/#comment-21870</guid>
		<description>Joanie,
Do you know the brand/source of your Czech fire-polished glass beads?  Preciosa claimed their products were lead-free (though I did not ask about cadmium) and they supplied us a certificate (unfortunately not by a certified third party).  Has anyone else tested &quot;Preciosa&quot; glass beads?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joanie,<br />
Do you know the brand/source of your Czech fire-polished glass beads?  Preciosa claimed their products were lead-free (though I did not ask about cadmium) and they supplied us a certificate (unfortunately not by a certified third party).  Has anyone else tested &#8220;Preciosa&#8221; glass beads?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanie</title>
		<link>http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/comment-page-1/#comment-21618</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 03:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/#comment-21618</guid>
		<description>“Swarovski® crystal tests at 21% lead. Celestial™ crystals test at 12 to 14% lead. Czech fire-polished crystals have no lead.”

I&#039;m not sure how the info began circulating, but Czech fire-polished beads are not lead free.
I have a children&#039;s jewelry company and have had Czech fire-polished glass beads tested by a third-party accredited lab and they DO CONTAIN LEAD.  The clear one&#039;s did not pass the lead test (130 ppm) and neither did the yellow (270 ppm).  Although the red passed for lead (60 ppms), the cadmium levels didn&#039;t pass (1400 ppms).  I believe the federal limits for cadmium are set at 100 ppms as well, but I believe their are 5 states that currently have them as low as 70 ppms.
If you design children&#039;s jewelry, I would highly recommend having your beads tested and not just assume and take the manufacturer&#039;s word :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Swarovski® crystal tests at 21% lead. Celestial™ crystals test at 12 to 14% lead. Czech fire-polished crystals have no lead.”</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how the info began circulating, but Czech fire-polished beads are not lead free.<br />
I have a children&#8217;s jewelry company and have had Czech fire-polished glass beads tested by a third-party accredited lab and they DO CONTAIN LEAD.  The clear one&#8217;s did not pass the lead test (130 ppm) and neither did the yellow (270 ppm).  Although the red passed for lead (60 ppms), the cadmium levels didn&#8217;t pass (1400 ppms).  I believe the federal limits for cadmium are set at 100 ppms as well, but I believe their are 5 states that currently have them as low as 70 ppms.<br />
If you design children&#8217;s jewelry, I would highly recommend having your beads tested and not just assume and take the manufacturer&#8217;s word <img src='http://jewelry-business-blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne Allred</title>
		<link>http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/comment-page-1/#comment-8566</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne Allred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/#comment-8566</guid>
		<description>Can anyone tell me about packaging or batching rules that run parallel to the CPSIA? I sell children&#039;s bracelets and I can&#039;t seem to find any specific information about either one of those things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone tell me about packaging or batching rules that run parallel to the CPSIA? I sell children&#8217;s bracelets and I can&#8217;t seem to find any specific information about either one of those things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rena Klingenberg</title>
		<link>http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/comment-page-1/#comment-6644</link>
		<dc:creator>Rena Klingenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/#comment-6644</guid>
		<description>Russ, thank you so much for posting this important update!  I very much appreciate your keeping us updated on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ, thank you so much for posting this important update!  I very much appreciate your keeping us updated on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Nobbs</title>
		<link>http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/comment-page-1/#comment-6638</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Nobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/#comment-6638</guid>
		<description>A recent question in my own Rings &amp; Things forum reminded me that not everyone knows that the CPSC exempted a group of materials form testing.. These are products that do not contain lead unless it has been added to the normal product. 
CPSC published a guideline for crafters at http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/smbus/cpsiasbguide.html
Here is a link to the PDF of CPSIA guidelines http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/smbus/cpsiasbguide.pdf  I&#039;ll quote the list of exclusions below:

&quot;These materials or components can be used (separately or in combination) and sold (provided they have not been treated or altered or undergone any processing that could result in the addition of lead):
• Wood
• Other natural materials such as coral, amber, feathers, fur, leather, etc.• Paper and other materials made from wood or cellulosic fiber
• Dyed or undyed textiles (cotton, wool, hemp, nylon, yarn, etc.), including..
children&#039;s fabric products, such as baby blankets, and non-metallic thread and trim. This does not include products that have rhinestones or other ornaments that may contain lead or that have fasteners with possible lead content (such as buttons, metal snaps, zippers or grommets). • Children&#039;s books that use modern printing processes (CMYK process printing
inks). This does not include any part of a book that may contain lead (plastic, metal, or painted parts, such as spiral binding).
• Certain educational materials, such as chemistry sets
• Precious gemstones: diamond, ruby, sapphire or emeralds
• Semiprecious stones provided that the mineral or material is not based on lead and is not associated with any mineral based on lead
• Natural or cultured pearls
• Surgical steel/other stainless steel except stainless steel designated as 303Pb
• Gold, of at least 10 karats
• Silver, at least 925/1000 pure
• Platinum, palladium, rhodium, osmium, iridium, ruthenium, and titanium&quot;

Under the CPSIA the above items do not need to be tested. However, if you sell in Illinois, there are more restrictive rules that may require you to test your items. Other state laws may have more restrictive limits. 

The full forum thread at Rings &amp; Things is http://www.rings-things.com/forum/index.php/topic,2947.0.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent question in my own Rings &amp; Things forum reminded me that not everyone knows that the CPSC exempted a group of materials form testing.. These are products that do not contain lead unless it has been added to the normal product.<br />
CPSC published a guideline for crafters at <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/smbus/cpsiasbguide.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/smbus/cpsiasbguide.html</a><br />
Here is a link to the PDF of CPSIA guidelines <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/smbus/cpsiasbguide.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/smbus/cpsiasbguide.pdf</a>  I&#8217;ll quote the list of exclusions below:</p>
<p>&#8220;These materials or components can be used (separately or in combination) and sold (provided they have not been treated or altered or undergone any processing that could result in the addition of lead):<br />
• Wood<br />
• Other natural materials such as coral, amber, feathers, fur, leather, etc.• Paper and other materials made from wood or cellulosic fiber<br />
• Dyed or undyed textiles (cotton, wool, hemp, nylon, yarn, etc.), including..<br />
children&#8217;s fabric products, such as baby blankets, and non-metallic thread and trim. This does not include products that have rhinestones or other ornaments that may contain lead or that have fasteners with possible lead content (such as buttons, metal snaps, zippers or grommets). • Children&#8217;s books that use modern printing processes (CMYK process printing<br />
inks). This does not include any part of a book that may contain lead (plastic, metal, or painted parts, such as spiral binding).<br />
• Certain educational materials, such as chemistry sets<br />
• Precious gemstones: diamond, ruby, sapphire or emeralds<br />
• Semiprecious stones provided that the mineral or material is not based on lead and is not associated with any mineral based on lead<br />
• Natural or cultured pearls<br />
• Surgical steel/other stainless steel except stainless steel designated as 303Pb<br />
• Gold, of at least 10 karats<br />
• Silver, at least 925/1000 pure<br />
• Platinum, palladium, rhodium, osmium, iridium, ruthenium, and titanium&#8221;</p>
<p>Under the CPSIA the above items do not need to be tested. However, if you sell in Illinois, there are more restrictive rules that may require you to test your items. Other state laws may have more restrictive limits. </p>
<p>The full forum thread at Rings &amp; Things is <a href="http://www.rings-things.com/forum/index.php/topic,2947.0.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.rings-things.com/forum/index.php/topic,2947.0.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Nobbs</title>
		<link>http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/comment-page-1/#comment-6285</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Nobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jewelry-business-blog.com/jewelry_business/lead-containing-jewelry-law-important/#comment-6285</guid>
		<description>You are asking a legal question, Joan. I&#039;m not a lawyer. Very few of us here have legal qualifications. You should ask your exact question directly of the CPSC at http://www.cpsc.gov/about/contact.html 
At least 2 of the commissioners have blogs where you could ask your question. 
http://nancynord.wordpress.com/
http://safetyandcommonsense.blogspot.com/

Common sense says that if you sell an adult product to an adult and they choose to give it to a child you have no responsibility. However, common sense is not a big part of the CPSIA, a law that makes it illegal to resell used products in a thrift shop without destructive testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are asking a legal question, Joan. I&#8217;m not a lawyer. Very few of us here have legal qualifications. You should ask your exact question directly of the CPSC at <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/about/contact.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cpsc.gov/about/contact.html</a><br />
At least 2 of the commissioners have blogs where you could ask your question.<br />
<a href="http://nancynord.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://nancynord.wordpress.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://safetyandcommonsense.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://safetyandcommonsense.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>Common sense says that if you sell an adult product to an adult and they choose to give it to a child you have no responsibility. However, common sense is not a big part of the CPSIA, a law that makes it illegal to resell used products in a thrift shop without destructive testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

